logo

Shifting Narratives: The Evolution Beyond Polar Bears as the Symbol of Climate Change

For decades, the haunting image of distressed polar bears struggling on distant ice caps served as the iconic symbol of climate change, sparking global concern. However, as experts began questioning the effectiveness of these visuals, a shift occurred in the narrative of climate change representation.

In a desolate hunting camp in the Baffin Islands, Northern Canada, photographers Cristina Mittermeier and Paul Nicklen witnessed a heart-wrenching scene: a polar bear, with mangey fur and a gaunt frame, taking slow and labored steps, scavenging for food in an abandoned barrel. Mittermeier captured this poignant moment, which later became one of the decade's most viral and controversial polar bear images, featured in National Geographic Magazine in December 2017. The accompanying subtitles declared, "This is what climate change looks like," and the image quickly garnered an estimated 2.5 billion views, sparking a global discussion about the impacts of melting ice caps and global warming.

However, over the last decade, a shift has occurred in the perception of such visuals. Critics argue that these iconic images, once hauntingly attention-grabbing, are too distant, unrelatable, and emotionally devastating. There has been a growing call for more diverse representations of climate change. Media outlets, in response to this critique, have transitioned to showcasing images of extreme weather events, such as heatwaves, droughts, and typhoons – issues that hit closer to home for many.

While experts agree that ice caps are undeniably melting at alarming rates, there is a growing realization that images of distressed polar bears may not convey the full complexity of the climate change story. As the visual narrative evolves, the focus on diverse and relatable representations becomes crucial to fostering a broader understanding of the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change.

The decline in sea ice concentrations by 13% per decade since 1979, attributed to rising global temperatures, has reached a staggering low in Antarctica in 2023, setting an unprecedented winter benchmark labeled "mind-blowing" by the National Snow and Ice Data Center. This profound change in sea ice profoundly impacts polar bears, compelling them to spend less time on ice, undergo extended fasting periods, experience weight loss, and bear fewer cubs.

However, the use of shocking polar bear photos as a direct representation of these changes is met with caution by Michael Pritchard, a photo-historian at the Royal Photographic Society. He emphasizes the importance of considering the context, methods, and motivations behind such images, cautioning that a photograph may not always present an accurate portrayal of reality.

The controversy surrounding Cristina Mittermeier's polar bear photo, depicting a starving bear with a link suggested between its condition and climate change, led to criticism and prompted National Geographic to acknowledge that they had "gone too far." Mittermeier, co-founder of SeaLegacy, a climate campaign organization, clarified that her intention was not to make a scientific assertion but to spark conversation. She emphasized the power of striking visuals, akin to iconic images such as the 1972 "Napalm Girl," in altering public discourse and raising awareness about existential threats like climate change.

In Mittermeier's perspective, these visuals serve as moments that compel society to recognize the broader impact of climate change on both animals and humanity. The paradox lies in the delicate balance between evoking emotion and ensuring accurate representation in visual narratives surrounding climate change.

While polar bears were once powerful symbols of climate change, experts now argue that their effectiveness has diminished, potentially misrepresenting the broader species and creating distance from the imminent threat of climate disaster. Polar bear images, once compelling tools for inspiring donations and raising awareness, are now viewed with skepticism.

According to Michael Pritchard, a photo-historian at the Royal Photographic Society, polar bears, like pandas, became endearing symbols for nature conservation. Their perceived cuteness made them instantly appealing for fundraising and awareness campaigns. Pritchard notes that using other animals, like fish or amphibians, would not have the same popular appeal.

Research by Saffron O'Neill, an expert in climate and society at the University of Exeter, highlighted the saturation of polar bear images in news and popular science media, particularly in the UK. Polar bear visuals comprised a significant portion of climate news coverage, peaking between 2% and 6% during the period 2000–2010. O'Neill's study also found that UK participants frequently associated polar bears with climate change when prompted to recall images related to the topic.

However, Kate Manzo, a lecturer in climate change communication at Newcastle University, describes these visuals as "paradoxical" – images conveying conflicting messages. Manzo argues that campaigns using polar bear images often misrepresent the animals, emphasizing that they are not "little white fluffy toys." She draws a parallel with anti-poverty campaigns featuring malnourished African children, highlighting the potential reinforcement of problematic colonial stereotypes.

The use of polar bear images in climate change campaigns carries a risk of alienating the public by creating a perception that the issue is detached from their immediate reality. Stereotypical depictions of the Arctic as icy, remote, and otherworldly may distance people from the tangible impacts of climate change. Saffron O'Neill emphasizes that such iconic visuals can exclude essential perspectives, particularly those of indigenous Arctic communities.

Kate Manzo argues against relying on a single symbol to represent a global problem with localized effects, suggesting that extreme weather visuals are more relatable and impactful. Recent images of floods in the UK, tourists fleeing heatwaves in Greece, and wildfires in Canada bring the climate crisis closer to home, challenging the notion that it is a distant problem.

In the 2010s, non-profits like Oxfam and Christian Aid initiated a shift away from traditional polar bear images with campaigns advocating for "people not polar bears." News desks followed suit, pledging to move away from defaulting to polar bear images in climate change coverage. Fiona Shields, the picture editor at the Guardian, announced a departure from using polar bears as illustrations of the climate emergency in 2019, acknowledging the limitations of relying on traditional symbols.

As media outlets seek alternative images, many turn to resources like Climate Visuals, an evidence-based climate photography library founded by Climate Outreach. This organization offers a collection conforming to the seven principles of climate communication, with a focus on showing real people to foster a more relatable and nuanced understanding of the climate crisis.

The use of polar bear images in climate change campaigns carries a risk of alienating the public by creating a perception that the issue is detached from their immediate reality. Stereotypical depictions of the Arctic as icy, remote, and otherworldly may distance people from the tangible impacts of climate change. Saffron O'Neill emphasizes that such iconic visuals can exclude essential perspectives, particularly those of indigenous Arctic communities.

Kate Manzo argues against relying on a single symbol to represent a global problem with localized effects, suggesting that extreme weather visuals are more relatable and impactful. Recent images of floods in the UK, tourists fleeing heatwaves in Greece, and wildfires in Canada bring the climate crisis closer to home, challenging the notion that it is a distant problem.

In the 2010s, non-profits like Oxfam and Christian Aid initiated a shift away from traditional polar bear images with campaigns advocating for "people not polar bears." News desks followed suit, pledging to move away from defaulting to polar bear images in climate change coverage. Fiona Shields, the picture editor at the Guardian, announced a departure from using polar bears as illustrations of the climate emergency in 2019, acknowledging the limitations of relying on traditional symbols.

As media outlets seek alternative images, many turn to resources like Climate Visuals, an evidence-based climate photography library founded by Climate Outreach. This organization offers a collection conforming to the seven principles of climate communication, with a focus on showing real people to foster a more relatable and nuanced understanding of the climate crisis.

In every corner of our nation, hardworking individuals don't need a team of statisticians from the Office of National Statistics to confirm what they already sense—the economy is grappling with challenges. The palpable effects of soaring inflation, surging interest rates, and escalating energy bills ripple through our daily lives, mirroring the struggles on every bustling high street. As we approach the pivotal Autumn Statement, the Chancellor must adopt a laser-like focus on avenues that promise the most potent infusion of energy into our economic veins—where every pound spent yields the greatest impact.

In a moment of foresight during the Spring Budget announcement in March, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt introduced a groundbreaking policy known as "full expensing." This ingenious move empowers businesses to immediately subtract the entire cost of their investments from their corporate tax obligations, circumventing the traditional protraction of deductions over several years. Effectively, it's a turbocharged stimulus for enterprises, turning the wheels of job creation and economic growth. Hunt's bold stroke translated into a substantial £10 billion tax cut for businesses, leveling the playing field for those investing in the expansion of job-creating infrastructure and cutting-edge machinery. A transformative feat, where the relief granted for procuring substantial equipment mirrors that for more mundane office supplies.

Notably, this innovative policy catapulted Britain ahead of its European counterparts, securing our status as the sole major European nation with such a generous incentive. However, there's a catch—the policy unveiled in March carries an expiry date, a mere three-year lifeline set to terminate in 2026. Despite murmurs that the Autumn Statement might extend this lifeline to 2029, it remains insufficient. Businesses crave certainty and confidence to commit to long-term investments, and the transient nature of the policy raises eyebrows, casting shadows on the sustainability of this economic adrenaline shot. As the Autumn Statement looms, the imperative lies not only in extension but in crafting a framework that propels businesses forward with unwavering assurance, fostering an environment conducive to enduring growth.